Updated: October 23, 2024
By Sankara Ganesh , Maria Cramer , and Dr. Kelly Hamby

FS-2023-0656  |  March 2024

Strawberry Sap Beetle Management in Maryland Strawberry Production

(a) A close-up photo of an adult strawberry sap beetle with a light brown "X" marking on its back. (b) An adult sap beetle feeding on a strawberry. (c & d) Two examples of sap beetle larvae, which are similar to strawberry sap beetle larvae.
Figure 1. (a) Adult strawberry sap beetle with light brown “X” marking on back (Katja Schulz, iNaturalist (CC BY). (b) Adult sap beetle feeding on strawberry (Kelly Hamby). (c & d) Example sap beetle larvae, similar to strawberry sap beetle larvae (Shea Ill).

Maryland strawberry growers who produce diverse fruit crops or run pick-your-own operations may face issues with strawberry sap beetle, an elusive pest that directly damages strawberry fruit. Strawberry sap beetles are difficult to spot in the field because they are small and quickly scatter when disturbed. Although they are small, they can cause severe feeding damage in strawberry plantings. Preventing this damage is challenging, but understanding strawberry sap beetle damage, identification, and life cycle can help growers successfully implement control measures.

Damage

Strawberry sap beetles cause yield losses by directly damaging fruit. Adult beetles are attracted to nearly ripe, ripe, and overripe strawberries (Demchak, 2013), especially those with other pest or mechanical damage (Connell, 1980). Fruit rot disease, specifically anthracnose fruit rot, can also make strawberries more attractive and susceptible to infestation (Swett et al., 2020). Strawberry sap beetles bore small holes into strawberries that are near or touching the soil (Demchak, 2013) and feed on them. Because of this, beetles can also easily access matted row strawberries. While feeding, adults lay eggs that hatch into larvae, which also feed directly on strawberries (Loughner et al., 2007). Larvae can sometimes be found inside strawberries, which customers find unappealing (Loughner et al., 2008). Although the beetles’ damage primarily results from feeding, they can also cause damage by spreading pathogens that cause fruit rot diseases (Loughner et al., 2007; Rondon et al., 2017).

Identification

Two pictures side by side. The first image (a) shows a strawberry with feeding damage caused by sap beetles. The damage appears as sunken edges on the surface of the strawberry. The second image (b) shows a strawberry with feeding damage caused by slugs. The damage appears as holes with clean edges, and there are slime trails left behind by the slugs.
Figure 2. (a) Characteristic strawberry sap beetle feeding damage with sunken edges (Natalie Hummel, LSU). (b) Characteristic slug feeding damage. Damage looks similar to strawberry sap beetle damage, but the holes are cleaner and slugs often leave behind slime trails (Maria Cramer).

Strawberry sap beetle adults are brown and oval shaped (Demchak, 2013), with a lighter brown X-shaped marking across their outer wings (elytra) (Figure 1a). Like all sap beetles, they have clubbed antennae (Rondon et al., 2017), but with a length of 1/8 to 1/10 of an inch (Ewing, 2004), they are smaller than many other sap beetle species (Figure 1b). Larvae are off white, less than 1/4 of an inch in length, and have two large smoky gray spots near their head (Peng et al., 1990) (Figure 1c and Figure 1d).

If strawberry sap beetle adults or larvae cannot be found, examine the strawberry damage carefully because slug damage can easily be mistaken for sap beetle feeding. The key difference is that strawberry sap beetles leave behind circular holes that are soft and sunken (Figure 2a) while slug damage holes have cleaner edges and are irregularly shaped (Figure 2b). Additionally, slugs may feed on leaves, may leave behind slime trails as they feed (Figure 2b), and are more likely to feed on unripe fruit than other strawberry pests. Slug damage can also be confirmed by scouting for the slugs themselves at night with a headlamp or flashlight, or in the morning on cool, wet days (Burrack & Toennisson, 2014; Demchak, 2013). It is critical to correctly identify which pest is responsible for damage, because control measures for sap beetles are not effective against slugs. Damage from both pests can occur on the same berries as well.

Life Cycle

Adult beetles are attracted to strawberries as they begin to ripen in May and June, and populations can increase over the summer as other host fruits ripen and rotting fruit accumulates (Demchak, 2013; Loughner et al., 2007) (Figure 3). Adults lay eggs inside fruit, eggs hatch into larvae, and larvae develop before pupating in the soil and emerging as a new generation of adults (Demchak, 2013). Strawberry sap beetle takes about 20 days at an average temperature of 68.9℉ to develop from an egg to an adult (Weber & Connell, 1975). Various crops including blueberries, raspberries, cherries, melons, and peaches serve as additional hosts on which beetles can feed and develop, so farms that produce diverse fruit crops may be more prone to sap beetle pressure (Demchak, 2013; Loughner et al., 2007). Blueberries and raspberries in particular may also serve as overwintering sites (Loughner et al., 2007). Pick-your-own operations are also at higher risk of infestation because customers often leave behind ripe and overripe fruit (Demchak, 2013) that attract strawberry sap beetles from overwintering sites. Traps baited with food odor (fermenting fruit or bread dough) may be used to monitor migrating adults by placing them along wooded edges near fields (Loughner et al., 2008).

 

Cultural Control

Cultural approaches are the most effective methods for preventing strawberry sap beetle infestations. Thorough sanitation is critical for interrupting the sap beetle life cycle and preventing populations from building up (Demchak, 2013). At pick-your-own farms, consider providing customers with separate containers for collecting damaged and overripe fruit (Sial et al., 2018). It may also help to hire farm labor to remove any remaining unmarketable fruit (Sial et al., 2018); however, labor costs may make this uneconomical. These strategies have been implemented by pick-your-own operations to control spotted wing drosophila, another pest that is attracted to and reproduces in ripe and overripe fruit (Sial et al., 2018). Once collected, unmarketable fruit should be destroyed (Demchak, 2013; Sial et al., 2018). Sealing fruit in plastic bags and leaving in the sun to solarize destroys spotted wing drosophila in raspberries (Leach et al., 2017) and may be effective for other pests like sap beetles, but has not been tested for them. Although the length of time necessary to kill sap beetles is unknown, freezing the fruit should also work. At grower-harvested farms, harvest as much as possible as frequently as possible, making sure to remove and destroy all damaged fruit, overripe fruit, and debris (Demchak, 2013). On farms that produce diverse fruit crops, sanitation is important in later-ripening fruits as well since they also attract strawberry sap beetles. In matted row production, renovate fields immediately after harvest to destroy any remaining fruit and to disturb strawberry sap beetles pupating in the soil, interrupting their life cycle (Dively & Embrey, unpublished).

Growers can also take preventative measures when planting strawberries. Planting a manageable amount of strawberry acreage can help prevent overripe fruit from accumulating during harvest (Demchak, 2013). It may also help to avoid planting strawberries directly adjacent to wooded areas and other fruit crops that could serve as overwintering sites for strawberry sap beetles (Loughner et al., 2007). Additionally, plasticulture may help suppress strawberry sap beetle populations and prevent feeding damage (Dively & Embrey, unpublished). The exact mechanism explaining this is unknown, but it is possible that plasticulture prevents fruit from contacting soil, making it less accessible. Additionally, plasticulture warms the fruit, which may make it less favorable for feeding. However, moving to plasticulture will impact frost and freeze management.

Chemical Control

Always read and follow the safety information and application instructions on the label. The label is the law.

On their own, insecticides are not highly effective against strawberry sap beetles because beetles and larvae are usually protected inside and under fruit (Demchak, 2013); however, various insecticides provide some degree of control (Table 1). If multiple insecticide applications are necessary, rotate between products with different activity groups to help delay resistance.

Table 1. Pesticides approved for strawberry sap beetle control in Maryland. Effectiveness ratings are from the 2013-2014 Mid-Atlantic Berry Guide.
Trade Nameᴬ Activity Group Active Ingredient REI PHI Efficacy Application Restrictions Maximum Usage (ai/acre/year)
Assail 70 WP 4A Acetamiprid 12 hrs 1 day Slightᴮ 2 applications per year
7 days between applications
0.26 lb
Brigade 3 Bifenthrin 12 hrs 0 days Very N/A 0.5 lb
Cormoran 4A, 15 Acetamiprid, Novaluron 12 hrs 1 day No rating 35 fl oz per acre per season
7 days between applications
0.26 lb acetamiprid, 0.23 lb novaluron
Danitol 2.4 EC 3 Fenpropathrin 24 hrs 2 days Moderate 2 applications per year 0.8 lb
Diazinon 50W 1B Diazinon 3 days 5 days Moderate 1 lb ai/acre per application
30 days between applications
2.0 lbs
Dibrom 8 Emulsive 1B Naled 48 hrs 1 day Moderate 5 applications per season
7 days between applications
Do not apply above 90 °F
4.7 lbs
Malathion 8 1B Malathion 12 hrs 3 days Slight 4 applications per year
7 days between applications
2.0 lbs
Rimon 0.83 ECᶜ 15 Novaluron 12 hrs 1 day Slightᴰ 7 days between applications 0.23 lb
Sevin 4F 1A Carbaryl 12 hrs 7 days Moderate 5 applications per year
7 days between applications
10 quarts

ᴬ Other formulations or products with the same active ingredient may also be effective. Use of a product name does not imply endorsement of the product to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

ᴮ The southern region IPM guide (Hale et al., 2022) ranks Assail 30SG as “good,” but they also face a broader complex of sap beetle species and primarily grow plasticulture strawberries. This product likely has not been tested against strawberry sap beetle.

ᶜ Rimon targets larvae and should be applied as soon as adults are spotted.

ᴰ Efficacy tests in southern regions indicate that including Rimon in spray rotations can improve control due to the control of the larvae, but it has not been tested against strawberry sap beetle. The southern region IPM guide (Hale et al., 2022) ranks Rimon 0.83EC as “excellent.”

References

  • Burrack, H., & Toennisson, A. (2014). Slugs in Strawberries. North Carolina State Extension. https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/slugs-in-strawberries#:~:text=Slugs%20are%20primarily%20a%20pest,ragged%20holes%20on%20the%20foliage.
  • Connell, W. A. (1980). Stelidota geminata (Say) Infestations of Strawberries (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae). Entomological News, 91(2):55-56.
  • Demchak, K., coord. (2013). Chapter 6: Strawberries. In A.Kristen (ed.), The Mid-Atlantic Berry Guide for Commercial Growers, 2013–2014 (pp 49-107). University Park: Penn State Cooperative Extension.
  • Dively G.P., Embrey M., unpublished. Effects of Mulching, Renovation, and Cultural Systems on Sap Beetle Populations in Strawberry; 1994 unpublished data.
  • Ewing, C. P. (2004). New Records and Taxonomic Updates for Adventive Sap Beetles (Coleoptera:Nitidulidae) in Hawai`i. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 79: 42-47.
  • Hale, F., Pfeiffer, D., Sial, A., Cato, A., & Favre, M. (2013). Entomology. In Brannen, B., Cline, B., & Melanson, R. (eds.) 2022 Southeast Regional Strawberry Integrated Pest Management Guide for Plasticulture Production (pp 16, 52, 57-58). University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. https://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.html?number=AP119-3
  • Leach, H., Moses, J., Hanson, E., Fanning, P., & Isaacs., R. (2017). Rapid Harvest Schedules and Fruit Removal as Non-Chemical Approaches for Managing Spotted Wing Drosophila. Journal of Pest Science, 91: 219-226.
  • Loughner, R. L., Loeb, G. M., Demchak, K., & Schloemann, S. (2007). Evaluation of Strawberry Sap Beetle (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Use of Habitats Surrounding Strawberry Plantings as Food Resources and Overwintering Sites. Environmental Entomology, 36(5):1059-1065.
  • Loughner, R.L., Loeb, G.M., Schloemann, S., & Demchak, K. (2008). Evaluation of Cultural Practices for Potential to Control Strawberry Sap Beetle (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 101(3):850-858.
  • Peng, C., Williams, R. N., & Galford, J. R. (1990). Descriptions and Key for Identification of Larvae of Stelidota Erichson (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Found in America North of Mexico. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 63(4), 626–633.
  • Rondon, S. I., Price, J. F., Cantliffe, D. J., & Renkema, J. M. (2017). Sap Beetle (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) Management in Strawberries. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/HS234
  • Sial, A., Little, B., Roubos, C., Isaacs, R., Grieshop, M., Leach, H., Bal, H., Fanning, P., Van Timmerman, S., Guedot, C., Jaffe, B., Walton, V., Rendon, D., Dalton, D. T., Hamby, K., Arsenault-Benoit, A., Rogers, M., Petran, A., Liburd, O., … Leskey, T. (2018). Management Recommendations for Spotted Wing Drosophila in Organic Berry Crops. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. https://secure.caes.uga.edu/extension/publications/files/pdf/B%201497_4.PDF
  • Swett, C. L., Butler, B. B., Peres, N. A., Koivunen, E. E., Hellman, E. M., & Beaulieu, J. R. (2020). Using Model-based Fungicide Programming to Effectively Control Botrytis and Anthracnose Fruit Rots in Mid-Atlantic Strawberry Fields and Co-manage Strawberry Sap Beetle (Stelidota geminata). Crop Protection, 134(1):105175.
  • Weber, R. G., & Connell, W. A. (1975). Stelidota geminata (Say): Studies of its Biology (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 68(4):649-653.

Download Publication